Leaked expansion gossip
- Thread starter Joy
- Start date
Hmm been reading a bit on the forums, getting some ideas about what might be expected from the DK 
Not too long ago death coil being the only one in a new spell class: Horror.
Necromancer + horror = " Lol they get a deathcoil that kills somebody in the raid group and puts you at full health" (could be fun!)
Anyway I suppose it will be decked with horror spells, Death and Decay. And maybe if I look at Diablo 2 and ingame deathknights necromancer raising slain enemies (pet ragnaros 4tw!)
Not too long ago death coil being the only one in a new spell class: Horror.
Necromancer + horror = " Lol they get a deathcoil that kills somebody in the raid group and puts you at full health" (could be fun!)
Anyway I suppose it will be decked with horror spells, Death and Decay. And maybe if I look at Diablo 2 and ingame deathknights necromancer raising slain enemies (pet ragnaros 4tw!)
Re:
I'd guess it's something in between. Having really rare (Ashbringer is still rare right? been away for a while now) loot as criterium would be too harsh, lame to add a class if only 0,0001% of the playerbase can play it. On the other hand, it wouldn't be called a hero class if everyone could just play one, they'd just say they're adding a new class. Whatever the criteria, TBC has no new class so it's always an improvement compared to that.
Anshrr said:Stuvvie said:I wanna be a necromancer! Anyway deathknight in my understanding is something else then a normal char.
It also says that you have to match certain criteria to be able to get one so I am kinda thinking: Ashbringer?
So then for the warglaives > Demon Hunter next?
A deathknight is a champion of the scourge, proven in life and swearing a bloodpact to the lich being resurrected to become a champion of the scourge so it's very weird all and the one way to avoid the scourge atm and becoming one would be the ashbringer imho
I can imagine the criteria is having a lvl70 or 80 toon already or something, as the Death Knight will start at a higher level/experiance. Maybe 60? 70? Just what I read over at mmo-champion atleast.
Having only a very small percentage of your playerbase beeing able to take part in such a huge part of an expansion (a new class, hero class at that), wouldn't really be too popular I can imagine.
I'd guess it's something in between. Having really rare (Ashbringer is still rare right?
been away for a while now) loot as criterium would be too harsh, lame to add a class if only 0,0001% of the playerbase can play it. On the other hand, it wouldn't be called a hero class if everyone could just play one, they'd just say they're adding a new class. Whatever the criteria, TBC has no new class so it's always an improvement compared to that. 
Anshrr
#1 LFR Feral for his ILVL
Found this on mmo-champion today:
....a quest? oO I was kinda more expecting like, level a pallie to 80 or something.. Hope they won't be too slow with the other hero classes, would suck to try to instance, with all death knights, and no healing ^^
/edit: Found more info:
....a quest? oO I was kinda more expecting like, level a pallie to 80 or something.. Hope they won't be too slow with the other hero classes, would suck to try to instance, with all death knights, and no healing ^^
/edit: Found more info:
That TBC came when alot of guilds were finally prepared for Naxx is such a shame, had a blast leading the raids for Naxx. Simply awesome instance
Braque said:
I agree Braque i want to explore the content we currently have before moving on to more stuff. Its only 6 months since i had to lvl in TBC im not jumping at the thought of doing that so soon agaiin.
